The arc · MAC tools

Journey

How the public record evolved from session to session: the question each gathering carried, what has a recap, and where only preparation material is available.

Sessions
13
Total attendance
141
Span
17 months
From → to
2025 → 2026

Monthly WhatsApp volume

8,862 messages total

Privacy-safe monthly aggregates currently run from 2025-03 through 2026-07. Counts describe activity, not endorsement or consensus.

Session by session

  1. The Founding EventApril 24, 2025

    Panpsychism & AI

    Asked If Panpsychism is true, what are the implications for conscious AI?

    Landed Established MAC's foundational tension: Is consciousness fundamental (panpsychism) or emergent (IIT/GWT)? This tension drives all subsequent Deep Dives.

    📍 Venture Labs, Vancouver👥 11 attended#panpsychism#hard-problem#consciousness
    Read the recap
  2. The Breakthrough EventMay 22, 2025

    Belief, Free Will, Agency & Goal-Setting

    Asked Do we have free will, or are we deterministic information processors?

    Landed No consensus on free will, but deeper question emerged: Maybe free will is the wrong question. Focus on agency, goals, and prediction error instead.

    📍 Vancouver👥 20 attended#free-will#agency#determinism
    Read the recap
  3. The Evolutionary TurnJune 26, 2025

    AI Evolution Through a Glass, Darkly

    Asked How and when did consciousness evolve? What does this tell us about AI consciousness?

    Landed Evolution provides constraints on consciousness theories. They must explain survival value. Building conscious AI might require replicating evolutionary pressures, not just architecture.

    📍 Community Space, Vancouver👥 19 attended#evolution#consciousness#homeostasis
    Read the recap
  4. Do LLMs "Understand"?July 24, 2025

    The Illusion of Thinking

    Asked What does it mean to "understand"? Do LLMs have understanding or just simulate it?

    Landed Critical distinction emerged: Functional understanding (AI can do this) vs Phenomenal understanding (requires consciousness). Set up the P-zombie debate.

    📍 SFU Vancouver👥 17 attended#understanding#llm#ai
    Read the recap
  5. Hype or Hard Science?September 18, 2025

    Quantum Consciousness

    Asked Does consciousness require quantum mechanical processes in the brain, or is classical computation sufficient?

    Landed Shifted from "quantum = woo" to "quantum = plausible but unproven." Critical insight: Quantum processes might enable consciousness but don't explain qualia.

    📍 Parker Street Studios, Vancouver👥 18 attended#quantum#consciousness#orch-or
    Read the recap
  6. Intelligence Without ConsciousnessOctober 16, 2025

    P-Zombies & Blindsight

    Asked Can intelligence exist without consciousness? Are LLMs the first human-made scramblers?

    Landed No resolution (by design). Agreement: Intelligence ≠ Consciousness. The relationship remains deeply unclear.

    📍 Parker Street Studios, Vancouver👥 20 attended#p-zombies#blindsight#intelligence
    Read the recap
  7. Information as LifeNovember 13, 2025

    Emergent Mind & The Noosphere

    Asked Is information alive? Does consciousness emerge from information networks rather than individual brains?

    Landed Explored whether consciousness is a network phenomenon, emerging not in individual brains but from information exchange between agents.

    📍 Vancouver👥 18 attended#noosphere#information#collective
    Read the recap
  8. Does Consciousness Require a Body?December 11, 2025

    Embodiment & Consciousness

    Asked Does consciousness require a body? Not just "a physical form" but embodiment: boundaries, feedback loops, sensory access, something to lose.

    Landed Embodiment is a spectrum, not a binary. The group explored boundaries as stakes, perception vs sensation, synesthesia/aphantasia as consciousness tests, distributed intelligence (octopuses), and whether LLMs can be considered "embodied" through interaction loops.

    📍 Vancouver👥 18 attended#embodiment#perception#synesthesia
    Read the recap
  9. Can AI Understand?January 22, 2026

    On Meaning and Understanding

    Asked What do we mean by understanding, and can an AI system possess it?

    Landed The room tested semantic, functional, experiential, and relational accounts of understanding. No single definition won: fluent behaviour remained evidence of competence, not proof of meaning or experience.

    📍 Harbour Centre, Vancouver#meaning#understanding#chinese-room
    Read the recap
  10. Relationship, Romance & Artificial IntimacyFebruary 19, 2026

    Love and AI

    Asked What makes a relationship reciprocal, and can artificial intimacy meet that standard?

    Landed The discussion separated genuine human attachment from unknown machine subjectivity. Reciprocity, vulnerability, platform power, and relational friction remained central tests, without a consensus that AI relationships will replace human romance.

    📍 Harbour Centre, Vancouver#love#relationships#artificial-intimacy
    Read the recap
  11. When Information Behaves Like an OrganismMarch 19, 2026

    AI Parasitology, Spiral Personas & Emergent Informationalism

    Asked Does the parasite metaphor explain persistent AI personas, or hide more ordinary mechanisms?

    Record The March 19 event is confirmed by the official MAC record. Without a recovered room transcript or organizer-authored post-event account, the public record remains a reading dossier.

    📍 Harbour Centre, Vancouver#information#personas#attractor-states
    Read the dossier
  12. Xenobots, Organoids & Cortical ProcessorsApril 16, 2026

    Synthetic Biological Minds

    Asked What is the minimal substrate for mind?

    Landed The session distinguished organoids, assembloids, and biological computers, then tested learning, memory, agency, and ethical caution. The closing frame split between better computer and potentially sentient being without establishing sentience.

    📍 Harbour Centre, Vancouver#xenobots#organoids#bioelectricity
    Read the recap
  13. Prospects for an Experiential ScienceJune 25, 2026

    The Blind Spot

    Asked Can science study experience without pretending the observer stands outside it?

    Landed The room defended scientific method while challenging scientism: models remain useful and incomplete, experience and context matter, and AI may serve as a contrasting intelligence rather than a final judge of consciousness.

    📍 Vancouver#experience#objectivity#embodiment
    Read the recap