Evidence / side by side
Compare the candidates
Seventeen propositions across nine policy areas. Each public cell uses one of five factual states and links back to its evidence.
There is no total. Adding unlike records together would create a verdict the evidence does not support. Listed alphabetically by surname.
Five answer states
Every state carries a word and a glyph, so meaning never depends on colour alone.
- Yes
- Direct evidence supports the proposition.
- No
- Direct evidence rejects the proposition.
- Conditional
- The position depends on stated conditions.
- Unclear
- Relevant evidence exists but does not resolve the proposition.
- No public position located
- Reasonable documented searches found no attributable position as of the check date.
Explore the record
Filter by issue, then open any answer to see the evidence behind it, its date, its confidence, and its source. The bar on each issue counts positions located across the whole field, which is a fact about the public record and not about any candidate.
Listed alphabetically by surname.
Showing All topics
1Municipal AI uses and prohibited uses
Where should the City use artificial intelligence, and where should it not?
Names one high-value municipal AI use
Names an unacceptable or prohibited AI use
2Public AI and automated-systems register
Should residents be able to see which systems the City runs?
Supports a public AI and automated-systems register
3Resident notice, explanation, review, and redress
What can a resident do when an automated system affects them?
Supports notice and plain-language explanation
Supports accountable human review and appeal
4Procurement, privacy, security, audit, and vendor lock-in
What conditions should apply when the City buys or builds an AI system?
Sets municipal AI procurement and audit conditions
Addresses privacy, data minimization, security, and residency
Addresses vendor lock-in, open standards, and City ownership or control
5Public workers, training, and workplace surveillance
What happens to the people who do the work?
Addresses worker consultation, training, and surveillance
6Data-centre development and physical impacts
How should Vancouver decide on data-centre proposals?
States a data-centre approval approach
Addresses electricity, water, cooling, heat, noise, and emissions
Addresses infrastructure costs, emergency planning, and decommissioning
7Public benefits, local capacity, and public-interest compute
What does the city get in return?
Requires measurable local and public benefits
Addresses accessible public-interest compute and local capacity
8First Nations governments, rights, and data governance
How would the administration work government to government?
Addresses government-to-government work with local First Nations
Distinguishes benefits from rights-based obligations
9First 100 days
What would actually happen, and by when?
Makes a measurable first-100-day commitment
How to read this
The useful part is the qualification and source, not the visual shorthand.
Status
The word answers one narrow proposition. It is not a complete description of a candidate’s worldview.
Qualification
Scope, date, evidence subject, conditions, and unresolved tensions stay visible beside the status.
Source
Follow the source IDs before relying on a claim. Campaign language, official action, and outside reporting are not the same evidence type.