Two durable pieces are in main
The canonical evidence pack and registry data model now exist in the repository with source IDs, shared definitions, disclosure classes, validation, and versioning foundations.
What we power. Who benefits. What stays here.
As recorded on August 21, the evidence and registry foundations were real and merged. The public argument, project hub, decision toolkit, governance layer, and live tools had not launched.
At capture time: foundation stage, enough substance to begin the public narrative, not a launch, and not an operating public registry.
The canonical evidence pack and registry data model now exist in the repository with source IDs, shared definitions, disclosure classes, validation, and versioning foundations.
These repository links preserve the delivery context behind the August 21 snapshot. The repository is private; public readers should use the current project link above.
The order keeps storytelling, data, governance, rights-holder review, and public release from quietly contradicting each other.
All thirteen delivery issues summarized without requiring anyone to read thirteen acceptance-criteria epics before breakfast.
Filter the historical issue summaries
Showing all 13 historical issue summaries.
Source register, 28-claim ledger, terminology, authority matrix, disclosure classes, and review gaps were in main.
15 normalized tables, 165 fields, 38 fictional demo records, 18 sheets, and deterministic validation were in main.
The research dependency was complete. The work still needed an implementation lane and Kris’s final copy approval.
The research dependency was complete. The hub could be built beside the article as staged or noindex.
The shared technical and municipal/public-review workbook could begin; First Nations content remained draft and gated.
Reviewer scope, compensation, participation terms, disclosure rules, and publication scope remained.
This waited on the toolkit model and applicable First Nations disclosure decisions.
The schema was complete; public UI waited for governance and safe projections.
This waited on the workbook, governance controls, and First Nations publication scope.
This waited on correction, fairness, and safe-disclosure rules.
This waited for stable inputs, governance, article, hub, toolkit, and reviewed First Nations scope.
This waited for the article and hub, then connected the project to the existing site.
Claims, rights, legal authority, engineering, privacy, accessibility, artifacts, SEO, production, and rollback remained.
Build it here. Make the bargain visible. Measure what actually remains.